McCain should be held responsible for racial remarks
Pratistha Koirala
Issue date: 9/3/08 Section: Commentary
McCain's use of the term and his refusal to stop is a reflection of his willingness to categorize people as "us" and "them." Eight years later, these comments still matter because they show him as a person who is willing to hate and stereotype an entire group of people. As the potential next president of the United States, McCain has a great deal of responsibility toward his fellow American citizens, residents and of course, the international community. With an estimated 14.9 million Asian American residents, McCain's comment could be interpreted as a racial attack to a large number of people within the United States' boundaries.
Furthermore, regardless of the context in which it was said, and whether or not it was justified, his words are offensive to 4 billion people, about 60 percent of the world's population. With the rise of Asia on the political scene, especially China's establishment as a world power, it is important to form and maintain good relationships. Our foreign policy for the past eight years has created widespread animosity toward America, and electing a person with a history of racist remarks will not help the world's perspective.
Because of his apparent intolerance for Asians, McCain cannot be seen as a healing force in foreign relations. As a world power, it is our responsibility to promote cultural literacy. Making racist remarks and allowing derogatory slurs to enter mainstream media and politics is a step against the basic principles of America as a place of open-mindedness.
As a country with ever increasing diversity, can we afford to have a leader who is willing to categorize people of color? We need a leader who can put aside his personal agendas of hatred. When McCain made his comments about "hating the gooks," he let his anger define a group of people based upon race and ethnicity. This is absolutely unacceptable, and McCain should be held responsible for these comments.
Furthermore, regardless of the context in which it was said, and whether or not it was justified, his words are offensive to 4 billion people, about 60 percent of the world's population. With the rise of Asia on the political scene, especially China's establishment as a world power, it is important to form and maintain good relationships. Our foreign policy for the past eight years has created widespread animosity toward America, and electing a person with a history of racist remarks will not help the world's perspective.
Because of his apparent intolerance for Asians, McCain cannot be seen as a healing force in foreign relations. As a world power, it is our responsibility to promote cultural literacy. Making racist remarks and allowing derogatory slurs to enter mainstream media and politics is a step against the basic principles of America as a place of open-mindedness.
As a country with ever increasing diversity, can we afford to have a leader who is willing to categorize people of color? We need a leader who can put aside his personal agendas of hatred. When McCain made his comments about "hating the gooks," he let his anger define a group of people based upon race and ethnicity. This is absolutely unacceptable, and McCain should be held responsible for these comments.
Spring Break
Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 8
L Fujimoto
posted 9/03/08 @ 4:46 AM EST
Give me a break! I'm Asian, and I understand EXACTLY what he means when he says that. When he said "Gooks" he meant the North Vietnamese that held him hostage, tortured and beat him for five years and you are going to judge him for saying that????
haha
posted 9/03/08 @ 11:58 AM EST
How about Obama's "white man's greed" remarks?
S
posted 9/03/08 @ 12:11 PM EST
This is ridiculous.. I say give me a break! I'm tired of the Daily Campus being so far left-wing to the point that there is basically only one opinion. (Continued…)
Conservative
posted 9/03/08 @ 12:22 PM EST
If you want a more "balanced" paper, go and write for it. However, you won't get any real information about either candidate from the media. Rather, you'll get these ridiculous articles about who said what. (Continued…)
john
posted 9/05/08 @ 8:04 AM EST
This is a satire piece right? If the author is truly sincere, I think you need to take a step back..look at the big picture of things..and see if you really are up to writing commentaries. (Continued…)
Jack Brookman
posted 9/22/08 @ 1:29 AM EST
Pratistha Koirala's article is a good, well-thought out piece.
What, on the other hand, IS the deal with all the idiotic comments here?
To "John": YOU are the one with the self-esteem issue. (Continued…)
Post a Comment