Sri Lankan gov't should end violence, seek settlement
Ali Mirza
Issue date: 4/20/09 Section: Commentary
The ongoing conflict in Sri Lanka has been the source of graphic images of death and destruction in recent months, as Sri Lankan government forces have moved in to obliterate the last vestiges of resistance by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the Northwestern region of the island nation. The LTTE is a rebel group that rose to prominence in the '70s by initiating a war of secession against the Sri Lankan government. The group's stated aim is the establishment of an ethnically separate Tamil homeland in the northwest part of the country, a goal the group has worked tirelessly toward for decades. This conflict has become known as the Sri Lankan civil war, and has led to the deaths of around 200,000 Sri Lankans since its start.
In recent years, the LTTE has lost significant ground. The dissolution of a cease-fire with government forces, followed by a prolonged military offensive by the Sri Lankan government, led to the loss of several key strategic areas to the LTTE. What seemed to be the final nail in the coffin came on Jan. 2, when the president of Sri Lanka, Mahinda Rajapaksa, announced that Sri Lankan troops had captured Kilinochchi, which the LTTE had used for over a decade as their de facto administrative capital. With the fall of Kilinochchi as well as the loss of most of the Jaffna Peninsula, which had been LTTE territory for most of the civil war, the conventional capabilities of the LTTE had been essentially declared irrelevant to the conflict.
What ensued has been a deadly assault by government forces, as they have moved in to crush what is left of LTTE resistance. Thousands of civilians are caught in the middle and many have died. The UN, in response to protests around world capitals, called for an immediate ceasefire, which was completely ignored.
The roots of this conflict lay in the formation of a Sri Lankan state in the wake of independence from Britain in 1948. The majority Sinhalese were successful in creating a state where the minority Tamils were marginalized from state formation process and essentially relegated to second-class status. Dozens of Tamil groups emerged in an attempt to bring about change through political protest. This was simply not a possibility, however, as the Sri Lankan government demonstrated its unwillingness to negotiate any meaningful settlements.
In recent years, the LTTE has lost significant ground. The dissolution of a cease-fire with government forces, followed by a prolonged military offensive by the Sri Lankan government, led to the loss of several key strategic areas to the LTTE. What seemed to be the final nail in the coffin came on Jan. 2, when the president of Sri Lanka, Mahinda Rajapaksa, announced that Sri Lankan troops had captured Kilinochchi, which the LTTE had used for over a decade as their de facto administrative capital. With the fall of Kilinochchi as well as the loss of most of the Jaffna Peninsula, which had been LTTE territory for most of the civil war, the conventional capabilities of the LTTE had been essentially declared irrelevant to the conflict.
What ensued has been a deadly assault by government forces, as they have moved in to crush what is left of LTTE resistance. Thousands of civilians are caught in the middle and many have died. The UN, in response to protests around world capitals, called for an immediate ceasefire, which was completely ignored.
The roots of this conflict lay in the formation of a Sri Lankan state in the wake of independence from Britain in 1948. The majority Sinhalese were successful in creating a state where the minority Tamils were marginalized from state formation process and essentially relegated to second-class status. Dozens of Tamil groups emerged in an attempt to bring about change through political protest. This was simply not a possibility, however, as the Sri Lankan government demonstrated its unwillingness to negotiate any meaningful settlements.
Spring Break
Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 4
Raj
posted 4/20/09 @ 9:46 AM EST
"The UN, in response to protests around world capitals, called for an immediate ceasefire, which was completely ignored."
Wrong. The SL government implemented 2 ceasefires - both of which were ignored by the LTTE. (Continued…)
carlos
posted 4/20/09 @ 12:35 PM EST
Carlos,
Oh yeah? When did that take place? Everyone knows that the major ceasefire brokered in 2002 was not hoered by SL govt. also, the recebt UN ceasefre was ignored by both sides, but SL govt hold most of the weight in the conflict. (Continued…)
venkatesh
posted 4/20/09 @ 2:22 PM EST
Long live the freedom fighters!
Post a Comment